|
Post by chulak on Oct 21, 2010 10:40:28 GMT -5
Now I've come to notice a social stigma in the store when it come to net decking. Obviously, it takes significantly more skill to be a good deck builder. But since it does take alot of skills to deck build, I don't see a reason why someone can't just copy a deck off the internet without being ridiculed And then if they win games they get yelled at more. Stop the hate!
|
|
|
Post by Deathofnation on Nov 4, 2010 22:00:55 GMT -5
I second that!
|
|
|
Post by justinhering on Nov 5, 2010 11:20:48 GMT -5
I totally plan on net decking to at least get started on an EDH deck. There are just too many cards that I don't know about and its a bit overwhelming.
Youtube is also a good resource, as there are many videos that give you ideas and combos without specifically giving you the deck list.
Lastly, I really like tappedout.net. I use it create decks, analyze curve, and even search cards. Its a really cool tool and absolutely free.
|
|
|
Post by salthefilmer on Nov 7, 2010 11:20:54 GMT -5
I HATE NET DECKING I RATHER GET BUMBLED BLUNTLY BY A WARHAMMER TO MY HEAD AND LIGHT UP ON FIRE BEFORE I NET DECK!!
|
|
|
Post by Deathofnation on Nov 10, 2010 15:55:28 GMT -5
.....Sal you do have a modified net deck. SO when do we get to watch you get "BUMBLED BLUNTLY BY A WARHAMMER TO MY HEAD AND LIGHT UP ON FIRE"
|
|
|
Post by chulak on Nov 11, 2010 12:14:06 GMT -5
There is no problem with net decking. Alot of decks start off with an idea and regardless of how drastically it changes, from an elf deck who adds Fauna shaman and vengevine to a blue white deck that plays the blue leyline and plays nothing like old control, they azre both based slighytly on other decks. I didn't net deck, but because i use cards that people play alot, good cards like day of judgement, my deck looks like a copy in some way
|
|